Headlines, Headlines, Headlines – 26 April 2009

April 26th, 2009 by stacyherbert

Stacy Summary:   When the Queen announces how much she costs the taxpayer, the palace recently began qualifying that cost on a per person basis.  So, in 2004, she only cost 2 pints of milk per person.  I think our banking royalty (and that’s what they are until we decide to revolt against it, which we haven’t), should do the same for the peasant taxpayers that finance their lifestyles.  It might help Timmy Taxpayer if he knew that Lord Banker Such and Such cost a pint of beer while Lady Hedge Fund Crook cost a glass of champagne.

Tags:   · 7 Comments

7 responses so far ↓

  • Really happy you pointed out just how indecent the upstart me me me banksters are next to Royalty.

  • Well, they can’t going living like that forever, enjoying everything for nothing but lies and theft.

    Nothing last forever, but in this case the people would just be so sick and tired of being sick and tired of these swine bankers, and throats will get slit. Maybe slit with an old rusty nail sharpened  on a dirty basement floor, or a piece of broken glass from a French wines bottle.  Ironically, almost any object can be turned in on a man and bring about his demise, his fitful end.

  • Bankers have created a financial Frankenstein, so what!
    People have to create their own system within the big system without ownership, ownership is the biggest downfall to people, it is the banks great idea. Lawyers, Governments, Insurance etc..  love peoples ownership.
    You never will be rich as long as you are an owner. If I want something from this planet, I Rent it!  why would I want to be an owner and let bankers & governments control me, I don’t get this out dated concept!  The capitalist era is over because it doesn’t work anymore that’s why new concepts will rise.

  • @BW

    I think what you’re talking about is “property rights”.  Don’t you believe you own or have property rights of your body and labor?  It’s “the state”‘s  misguided belief that they own you and your labor.  If you asserted your property rights over your body and labour, the state would have no “right” to tax(steal) from you.

    Read this article.  Maybe it will help with the “outdated” concept of property rights.
    http://mises.org/story/2569

  • @BW,

    If you were just talking about a house.  Yeah, you’d be crazy to “own” a house.  Land Taxes, utilities, heat, upkeep.  Ridiculous!

  • @William, thanks!  but you are missing my point!
    The whole world control is build around house
    ownership and it’s contents. It’s more then just Land Taxes, utilities, heat, upkeep.  that are Ridiculous!
    It’s: If you don’t pay your tax we will take away your house, If you don’t pay your credit card we will put a lien on your house, if you have a dispute and don’t comply we the lawyers will take away your house, if you don’t wipe our ass or stop demonstrating then we will take your house and so on……..that’s why Bush wanted everybody to own a house and the apartment concept has been converted to condo ownership.

  • you hit it on the head stacy.
    if the costs of the bankster’s and war costs were put into REAL item terms then the sheeple might wake up.
    hmmm like, today the “war on terror” cost me a 6′er, fresh tuna for dinner and my doz. donuts. well i can live w/o the donuts, but the beer. ARGH matey, that’s plain just wrong!