Thanks, saw it a while back.

Follow the money, follow the bankers. All roads lead to Babylon.

“It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true…. You are what the media define you to be. Greenpeace became a myth and fund generating machine.” (“Forbes”, Nov. 1991)

Even you Max admitted on a TAM months ago that you are only interested in these opinions to make your own decisions and investments. Well the answer you are digging for with your little Paul Watson question is “No one is going to stop wrecking the planet”. I’m sick of arguing that CO2 DOES heat up the planet. I sick of planting trees when no one else give a damn about. It really isn’t going to make any difference now.

Just look at drought around the world, starting with Califronia, and going to India, Pakistan, Kenya and on to China. Aquaifers around the whole planet that took thousands of years to build up are being drained. These links are all publisted within the last few days, most of the today 14th July.

http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?S=10719289&nav=menu86_2

http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=187931

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/12/india-water-supply-bhopal

http://allafrica.com/stories/200907130650.html

http://pakobserver.net/200907/14/Articles01.asp

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1198455/MARK-ALMOND-Chinas-battalions-brutality-As-thousands-troops-protesters-time-running-ruthless-regime.html

This last one suggest even the riots in China could be in part due to water shortage.

If people “rise up” they’ll do so under the misdirection and sleight-of-hand of the powerful global companies – they’ll fight to stop taxation on fuel, or any scarce resource, for example. Who are the companies that won’t want CO2 taxes – the bleedin’ fossil fuel industry, of course.

No one is going to “rise up” and say “we simple must tax CO2, make tuna more expensive and ration water and energy” are they?

Bit of a rant, but there you go.

For basics on the green agenda, here’s an excellent cached site:
http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:n_TzfG_omA8J:www.green-agenda.com/+paul+watson+green+agenda&cd=2&hl=ja&ct=clnk&gl=jp

The various pages can be accessed by searching for the titles and selecting cache.

The intro:

We should all want to be wise and careful stewards of the beautiful planet we call home. But most of us realize that humans in general are not being good stewards. We are wasteful with our natural resources and have reduced biodiversity. Therefore, when we read about groups and organizations calling for a ‘green revolution’ and a new relationship between humanity and nature it is easy to agree with their ideas.

However, certain aspects of the modern green movement that is permeating every segment of our society are not about protecting the environment. You don’t have to dig very deep to discover the true beliefs of the influential leaders who are using genuine concerns about the environment to promote an agenda of fear and control. Please carefully consider the implications of the opinions that they so openly and freely express.

Specific quote of Paul Watson (what a guy!):
“It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true.”

Clearly, all the key players are in the brotherhood. The rest are dupes.

Talking about “Deer Hunter”, first thought this to be the best Nam movie but than you had “Apocalyps Now” which realy blew my mind away and which I still consider to be a masterpiece.

Here’s a song which says it all “Hank Paulson is an Infidel!” http://tinyurl.com/cx9sw5

what does everyone think about Cap’n Paul Watson who skippers the Sea Shepherd.

There is some who think his means do not justify the ends – others think the opposite

What do you think?

http://www.onlinelivestock.com.au/classifieds.php?a=CS&at=3&bt=0&refinesaletype=4

@phil Yes, imho I think the biggest problem is the inertial of business models, which is logical because businesses will stop existing once their business model becomes undermined. As she sais however there is a reality there that will mean some models will become obsolete. To me the quicker the better. This goes for environmental concerns as well.

@supergeek I’m not worried about the robots.. ist virtual reality that spooks me out http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ph8pLK6BVM bad stuff..

@jterror Huffington post is a collection of bloggers, so any decernable direction (against gs for instance) simply reflects public sentiment. Don’t thing the republicans aren’t trying to mess with that.. apparently they agree..

I think AI is already here in the sense that most of our activities are augmented by information technology, sometimes without us being aware of it..