[KR05] The Keiser Report – with Charles Goyette

December 17th, 2009 by stacyherbert

Stacy Summary: The Keiser Report, episode 5 with Charles Goyette.

Tags:   · 233 Comments

233 responses so far ↓

  • The Buddha Nature. Oh yeah.

  • @Frances — heard of Dorje Shugden Buddhists? They think the Dalai Lama is a spiritual dictator:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wC-F6VUyGZM

    Bet they’re paid off by the oil companies to speak such heracy… :-)

  • contract law and property law eh?
    sounds like we’d be left with just cops and lawyers
    seems to me that’s pretty much the way it stands now
    ‘cept we have a symbolic legislative branch for show
    there’s never a unitary executive around when you need one

  • Why are you entitled imported oil?

    http://www.youtube.com/user/wepollock#p/u/0/mV2wgoXlHT4

    wepollock possibly a repost by now.

  • @ Adam

    Geologists, designers and mechanics have also joined the strike demanding that “we do not pay their crisis”

    Actually that is smart not scary.

  • anyone notice they’re doing this bogus climate meeting at the same time the insurance and government crooks are trying to ram down laws with this bullsheet give us your money medical bill thing to steal from the usa public.

    Crooks with suits.

  • Highly recommended reading. All bases are covered. It’s be interesting to find out the true bloodline of the God-King. He didn’t speak Tibetan until he was 6 years old.

    http://www.american-buddha.com/shadow.dalai.htm

  • @ jon

    I would not get to worried about those jon all the money is basically gone to wars and WS.

    It will probably take another 2 – 3 years for people to figure that out (If we are lucky).

  • Touche Gordo :)
    Perhaps what’s really scary is how implausible it is that such a thing could happen in the “Shining city on the hill” or the “sceptred isle” …

  • @Adam

    No Kidding

  • Mike, on currency, gold and silver…
    “they” do what ever they want and only their final goal is clear: one world government. How they gone do it, we do not know, we are pretty much out there in the dark! We know their goal and all the rest is merely speculation….

  • @anything but — wow! That American-Buddha site looks absurdly interesting. Thnx. I know I tease “Buddhists” a lot, but only because it’s frivolous and transgressive :-)

  • Nobody told me there’d be days like these…

  • Evo Morales made an interesting comment during his interview w/ Amy Goodman. He said that the Obama admin. has made comments on the new Bolivian constitution–comments specific to the management of Bolivia’s oil & gas sector. Morales understood the comments to mean that the Obama admin. wants those provisions in Bolivia’s constitution changed! He said that not even Bush took such an interest in their constitution or ever commented on it, and for that reason, he sees Obama as being worse than Bush!

    Interview is here: http://www.democracynow.org/2009/12/17/bolivian_president_evo_morales_on_climate

    (On constitutions, it seems like Obama’s technocrats are closely studying the constitutions of other countries. Obama made specific references to Afghanistan’s constitution after the “election” there; he made sure to point out that the election was fair and its outcome legitimate under the Afghan constitution. Of course it helps that Washington wrote the constitutions of Iraq and Afghanistan. But now it’s sounding like we have a special interest in the constitutions of oi/gas-rich countries. Could it be that Cheney’s prediction was right and that we’re on the cusp of hitting Peak Oil? [His prediction was 2010.])

    Chavez is also in the news; he’s pissed at the Netherlands for allowing US bases there, and is worried that they’ll be used as a launch-point for military action against Venezuela. He claims that the US has sent sent intelligence agents, war ships and spy planes already.

  • @MEP

    thx man, sweet links

  • @ Tofu Charlie

    If you’ve read a lot of Joseph Campbell (a guy who relished human sacrifice) you’ll be somewhat oriented to what you’re about to “receive”. Otherwise, buckle your seatbelt and remember the writing is soft pedaled. There are some simple grammatical mistakes that you can figure out because they’re repetitive.

    Print the lot out, get your yellow highlighter handy, and make brief notes on every page you read so you can remember the names and terminology.

    Am so pleased you are interested in it. You won’t regret reading it, I promise. Quite the hoot!

  • =======
    a) asbestos fire-proofing had deteriorated beyond repair
    b) the WTC was losing Billions of $s per year
    c) many floors were empty
    d) all the FBI / CIA / NSA evidence for Enron & all the others was in building #7
    =======

    The

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center

    and all dependant and closely related and dependant subpages need to fully reflect this.

    As far as the entity losing money, at some level I am not superized.

    There was a 1975 fire in one building that did damage, but as far as the Asbestos being in bad shape — that is overblown. Anyone that understands NYC corrupt building construction practices would tell you that it was a miracle that the buildings stood at all. They were severely overdesigned to cope with the hypercorrupt NYC building practices.

    The BBC pages around 2001 seemed to indicate not that many empty floors or spaces — but I suppose it is possible to lease less than a full floor. I suppose all the floor by floor records were burnt … if you know what I mean.

    As far as Enron evidence, any and all New York State judges are open to bribery and familial nepotism — I don’t see evidence being or not being an issue when normal corruption could fix the problem much cheaper.

    Important considerations, but if you fully account for how corrupt the US is and how there is no rule of law there — these are at best modest conspiracy theories that are unimaginative and intellectually low-balled by people telegraphing them in.

  • ============
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center#Lease

    In 1998, the Port Authority approved plans to privatize the World Trade Center. In 2001, the Port Authority sought to lease the World Trade Center to a private entity. Bids for the lease came from Vornado Realty Trust, a joint bid between Brookfield Properties Corporation and Boston Properties, and a joint bid by Silverstein Properties and The Westfield Group.

    By privatizing the World Trade Center, it would be added to the city’s tax rolls and provide funds for other Port Authority projects.

    On February 15, 2001, the Port Authority announced that Vornado Trust Realty had won the lease for the World Trade Center, paying $3.25 billion for the 99-year lease. Vornado Realty outbid Silverstein by $600 million though Silverstein upped his offer to $3.22 billion.

    However, Vornado insisted on last minute changes to the deal, including a shorter 39-year lease which the Port Authority considered nonnegotiable.

    Vornado later withdrew and Silverstein’s bid for the lease to the World Trade Center was accepted on April 26, 2001, and closed on July 24, 2001.
    ============

    Not to make too fine a point of it, but this sounds like a case of total corruption imploding in on itself. A 99 Year lease is totally daft anyway, unless the building is stone and mortar.

    A 20 year lease would have at least have had some legal standing, but that is too uncorrupt an idea to even be considered.

    I assume all the entities involved are hypercorrupt NYC entities, by defult.

  • @TC well the north be where am a fixen to move da family and start dirt farmin…open invitation to all with strong backs….lets start or own lil Waco.

  • @ Bill – y waste time considering the events of Sep 11 2001 now? It’s all now irrelevant I’m sorry to say

  • @Dan V — Waco, Thailand — lol! Careful, I might take you up on that offer :)

  • Pimp my war, top rankin’ Max and Stacy.

  • Good show! The pimpin’ piece was Fuhunny and then Goyette with more truth. Un peu de serieux et rigolo en plus? Who could ask for more? Keep it up pimp daddy!

  • max and stacy,

    best opener yet, YO!

  • Oh yeah those word clouds, did thievin’ lying bastards turn up as often as war mongering scumbags.

  • @Giuseppe Bagodonutti

    Sweden didn’t (don’t) have a negative savings rate. The Riksbank have a negative deposit rate, for over night deposits by commercial banks. To “encourage” them to lend to each other instead. All savings accounts has of course positive interest rates. I have 1,15% at my Swedish bank.