Comments on: [KR22] Keiser Report – Markets! Finance! Scandal!

By: SuperGreek

SuperGreek — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:54:52 +0000

@poh
I still haven’t had time to read read your very long first comment, sorry… surely it isn’t that difficult to read the previous comments and figure out my post wasn’t directed at you… especially as somebody else (@Nat) has already been polite enough to try and give you a clue and point you in the right direction!!!

By: pohdinpa

pohdinpa — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:08:10 +0000

@SuperGreek
misunderstand every little comment
GO AWAY LITTLE BOY, GROW UP, MOVE ON!!!
is not every little comment, that is a f***king insult, what the hell did I say in my post to deserve an insult? Why should you be able to call a 50 year old man a little boy and tell me to grow up? I was commenting on the Max Keiser video not the supergeek video. If you want to insult me from a distance I will insult you back. If we were face to face I crush your face instead, pissant little worm.

By: SuperGreek

SuperGreek — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:09:31 +0000

@Nat
cheers, sometimes it really aint safe round here… so many people seem really desperate for something to bothered about and always seem to misunderstand every little comment!!!

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:40:26 +0000

just watched the Degraw interview again, A.W.E.S.O.M.E!

By: Nat

Nat — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:39:03 +0000

P.S. In SuperGeek’s defence, the chicken article was a joke about the post immediately above his, how the ‘chickens’ are rising up.

By: Nat

Nat — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:35:27 +0000

If you’re implying there is a counter argument to be made then perhaps you can make that too, just as vehemently so at least that way we’ll get both sides of the story and avoid these pointless insults.

You seem to be pointing out that there is a lot of corruption and self interest from positions of power from all sides.

Then change that to 98% of the population who need to do something about it.

Why not join forces from all political angles?

By: pohdinpa

pohdinpa — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:46:40 +0000

hey SuperGeek
if that was @ me
What, you only think in 5 second bursts, or post links of stupid chicken fights, where’s a counter argument you ignoramous
F you Keiser bitch

By: SuperGeek

SuperGeek — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:11:47 +0000

GO AWAY LITTLE BOY, GROW UP, MOVE ON!!!

By: pohdinpa

pohdinpa — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:17:49 +0000

Yes I do realize wealth distribution is unequal in the US, but how much do the top 1% own in the beloved France or Greece or Germany, or how about Qatar or the UAE, China, Japan,England. True the official poverty figures in the US look bad but do you explain what poverty looks like in the US, food stamps, free housing, free medical care, free education with free meals, increasing welfare for each child with a deadbeat absent father. The system we the ignorant people of the US have built for ourselves, with much assistance from the government who themselves got assistance from the FED reserves printing presses, abets and harbors the welfare mentality prevalent and ingrained into the minds of our teeming masses. The very systems charged with the social safety nets we now have in place are much of the problem itself. Once charity gets enticed into the web of government oversight, you are assured it will always be needed in an ever increasing amounts, until ultimately it ends with the feudal system we are now evolving into. I think someone said something like “a welfare state is an anathema to a free society”.
Speaking of wealth distribution, how about those government employee unions that are distributing the wealth of the taxpayers right into their greedy paws, bankrupting states and municipalities and school districts, refusing pay cuts which causes job cuts, keeping their guaranteed benefit pensions fully paid for by taxpayers while non-union workers take pay cuts and contribute to their pensions. Government union members are now a majority of union members in this country, their pay 40-100% more than non government workers,
are they twice as efficient, twice as smart.
Unions only aid and abet the ongoing ponzi of illusory wealth, they are enablers of their members over-inflated financial egos, misrepresenting their worth as a worker. Just as banks hold hidden losses on their books, union members hold hidden losses on their earning power. Marked to market a union worker might be only worth half of his/her mark to model and when their greed ends in massive government layoffs they will discover that true price. Has Max or Stacy or any of their guests ever been in a union, watched as it destroyed a small company with outrageous wage and benefit demands, threaten to destroy the company with strikes and eventually driving that factory to move jobs first south then to Mexico, I have. Isn’t that the economic equivalent of what Hank Paulson did with congress, threaten destruction unless demands were met. What was the outcome, demands were met and destruction followed anyway. By the way, that was the UAW and the company made truck mirrors. I quit to go back to school. I took a 50% pay cut from that job when I went into electronic design, luckily as non-union because this time I was to watch the destruction from outside the union but inside the corporation. There I couldn’t pack up my desk contents into boxes and move them across the room for fear a union member see it and report I was doing a job of a union member. God forbid if I connected up the computer on my desk or swapped a monitor, you’d think it was a capitol offense. Again the outcome was the same, union meddling in day to day operations, seniority, wage and benefits destroyed the union manufacturing operations but the design part lived on, severely curtailed but alive.
Now to campaign finance reform, why should a private citizen like say Michael Moore or Al Gore, be able to spend millions under the covert cover of a documentary film be able to basically lobby the american people, attempting to sway public opinion through obfuscation and hyperbole, while a company, corporation or industry cannot. Do these so called “private” citizens have a monopoly on “truth”, do only “non-private” entities “lie”. If lying is a legitimate means to an end for progressives, it should also be for companies, industries, neocons, nazis, communists and any other individual or group. Freedom to speak is not just an individual right when there is also freedom to assemble. Al Gore can scream, FIRE IN THE SKY!, in the crowded kabuki theatre of climate-scam, causing a deadly stampede while Exxon has to tap each audience member on the shoulder and whisper to them that they are needed outside in the parking lot one at a time, maybe under the pretense of their car lights being on, then strangle them. The ends are the same, why not the means. With full disclosure of economic and political entanglements and transparency a level playing field is not an impediment to truth or justice

By: aubreyfarmer

aubreyfarmer — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:47:13 +0000

Watch this video and you will know the culprits of most of the serious problems facing the West and America in particular.The Khazarian Conspiracy, Part 1 of 12

By: Ingrid

Ingrid — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:12:29 +0000

@Phil
Facinating article. How’s the weather now where you r?

By: Dedo

Dedo — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:47:23 +0000

Y’all,.”‘Three hens and cockerel named Dude peck fox to death after it breaks into coop’”

And the cow jumped over the moon,..fk sake !,.some folk will believe anything (must be a city boy)

By: Daniel S

Daniel S — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:20:06 +0000

Not to nit-pick but to demonstrate a perspective, the gap between CEO earnings and those of workers is wider than quoted in the show. Earnings as conventionally viewed don’t take into account that workers are slaves who pay for their keep via the slave-owners’ market with their allowance (what the government lets them keep). After these workers pay for their slave hovels, gruel, garments etc, their remaining allowance that they can spend in any way they choose, is far less than one 500th of what CEOs would have remaining for themselves after affording themselves similar break-time living conditions. In terms of genuinely elective/discretionary spending CEOs earn thousands as much as the slaves working for the same corporations.

By: SuperGeeK

SuperGeeK — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:17:28 +0000

@Y’All
‘Three hens and cockerel named Dude peck fox to death after it breaks into coop’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1254900/Revenge-chicken-Three-hens-cockerel-named-Dude-peck-fox-death-broken-coop.html