The Seventy Percent

By Michael Krieger of http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/

Whoever expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization expects what never was and never will be.
-Thomas Jefferson

Bipartisan usually means that a larger-than-usual deception is being carried out.
-George Carlin

The Seventy Percent
People are going to be pissed off no matter who wins this election and that is a very important social dynamic I believe is vastly under appreciated by the majority of mainstream pundits and analysts out there.  This is also very distinct from the environment that prevailed in 2008.  Four years ago, the financial markets were crashing and the economic future of America was circling the toilet bowl, yet a majority of Americans embraced the potential of a young, inexperienced biracial politician from Illinois who was saying all of the right things.  Despite the gigantic disappointment he has proven to be as President, there is no denying that he had all of the Democrats and most Independents under his spell on this day four years ago.

Read the rest here: http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2012/10/25/the-seventy-percent/

22 thoughts on “The Seventy Percent

  1. 623-3

    Ha! One candidate will be a little better than the other. So much as Bush was fiscally conservative, and that’s how it went. There’s truth in Mike saying both options are false. I’m sorry to say this, but the Romney-Ryan duo is pathetic. Plain and simple. Obama might not be as ridiculous, but he ain’t much better in the end. Voting 3rd parties will only give votes to the winner from the 2 mainstream parties.

    But there’s one thing Mike gets wrong. Even if the 70% is angry with the political choices, they’re not going to move. Americans nowadays tend to be very much subservient. In my country when people are angry with the govt they take to the streets. And that happens every fucking day. I still have to see Americans doing the same. Damn, when was the last American nation-wide strike? Was there ever one?

    The only thing that would change that dynamic, as it did in North Africa, was hunger. Over there it was the price of bread. In the US it’ll probably be the price of gas. That’s the only thing that will wake up the dormant American populace.

  2. Silver Phoenix

    There was never an excuse to support the Obama puppet(you still have the problem from shooting from the hip, Max,) the information was there beforehand to know he was a piece of shit, with lots of us who bothered to do their homework, explaining so until hoarse to no avail. There is also no excuse this time around, the information is there yet again that shows it doesn’t matter whether puppet Obama or puppet Romney is used, and again gone over repeatedly by people who have bothered to do their homework, with the expectation again to no avail. It’s worse than uninformed, it’s willful ignorance and belief in a fairy tale that has to be unwound.

  3. Flopot

    I love the complacency of the peeps who say “both candidates are the same”. Of course they are the same – that is an anodyne statement these days. The important fact is that there are small differences between the candidates in terms of which corporatist faction they represent and minor variations in their styles of government.

    This difference is perfectly exemplified by 9/11 – that was a republican neo-con operation. So to quote the article, “Tragically, a President Romney will be no different.” is tragically not telling the whole story. Small differences between the corporatist candidates do lead to HUGE effects, 9/11 being the mother of all differences.

    So when you saunter around droning on about “uh, they are both the same”, just remember that small differences betweens styles of government can have huge consequences. So yes they are both the same in the end but I would RATHER NOT HAVE HAD 2 F**KING YEARS OF GEORGE BUSH JNR.

  4. daddy warbucks

    Political choices? the NWO is way past this farce:

    “These are the reports of which we may now be highly confident:
    Ambassador Christopher Stevens and our other killed and wounded individuals were among numerous covert operations personnel engaged in the retrieval of these chemical and rocket weapons, perhaps along with other military grade weapons systems.
    They have been in process of delivering them to Turkey by sea.
    Russia discovered this, as one might expect.
    Russia and Iran were behind the Benghazi raid, using trained Ansar al-Sharia commandos, a group identifying itself as al Qaeda in Libya

    These are the reports of which we may now be very concerned:
    Some of this chemical weaponry was or is to be used by the Turks, perhaps with the assistance of American special ops personnel, to fire upon some of the al Qaeda warriors in Syria who have been joining with Syrian rebels fighting Assad.
    This was to be a false flag attack blamed on the Assad regime, to concoct the inception of military engagement in Syria by NATO forces.
    Barack Obama has been directly involved in these plans, on a hands-on basis.
    The Innocence of Muslims film, nearly unknown by 9-11-12, was planned by contingency, to be declared the reason for any attacks upon the CIA’s Benghazi operations that could be described as riotous.

    ‘Leaked’ State Department Emails Turn Up The Heat”

    too much for this post see the rest here:

    PROPHECY UPDATE
    http://www.prophecyupdate.blogspot.com
    This first article is ominous for reasons previously discussed

  5. evolutis

    Cows watch chew, regurgitate, chew and watch, from across the fence. We, the crew from “far side”, [after some 3700 years] still “stepping in it”. We try our repetitive tactics to navigate what we were never designed to navigate … Hammurabi’s back forty.

    LOL / Quit stepping in it! All we have to do is step over the barb wire FENCE … take our technology, and reboot our “knowledge, as value,”replacement, environment.

    Start simple: A Council of [3] with a [3] day interval to prepare an agenda for a council of 9 with a 3 week interval to prepare an agenda for a council of 30 … full stop and make an assessment. A different environment promises different outcomes.

    …. or should we stick with the “legitimate rape” dead end mindset? Cows watch chew, regurgitate, chew and watch. Did i detect something on the chin,.. a bovine grin?

  6. Silver Phoenix

    @Flopot

    Nonsense, it’s not complacency, there is no substantive difference. If you’re voting Obama over Romney or vice versa, you’re a fucking moron.

  7. Youri Carma

    People gonna make themselves believe it’s best to vote for ‘the lesser of two evils’ and fool themselves again.

  8. Mariko Horseman

    “I have just received the following wire from my generous Daddy. It says, Dear Jack: Don’t buy a single vote more than is necessary. I’ll be damned if I am going to pay for a landslide.”John F. Kennedy

  9. Yawp

    I didn’t vote donkey or elephant. A part of me hopes Romnee will win to hasten the awakening. Americans expect change to be easy bake or like Max has said, they still think they have a chance to be in on something. From what I’ve read, real change is very very very difficult and takes real struggle. This type of conviction isn’t anywhere close to the anger of the seventy percent the author describes. Of course as the system continues to de-leverage the grain dust will continue to accumulate.

  10. Flopot

    @Silver Phoney

    Do you really think 9/11 would have happened under Al Gore? Like I said, you cannot f**king read. I AGREE THERE IS NO SUBSTANTIVE DIFFERENCE. THEY ARE CORPORATISTS. But only one side organized 9/11. You are moron if you cannot see that. Thank you for insulting me and pissing me off.

  11. Flopot

    @Yawp

    “A part of me hopes Romnee will win to hasten the awakening”

    That’s a piece of wisdom right there and I have suggested that in the past. Basically trigger the craziness to bring down the structure. But to insist that there is no difference in consequences between both parties is to ignore 9/11. That is being complacent. Simple as.

  12. Flopot

    @Silver Phoenix

    Well, maybe my orginal text about “complacency” might have been aggravating but you upped the ante with your moron jibe. Read what I said – they are both corportatists representing the corporations. We all know this. Nothing new here. But there are small differences that have huge consequences. Why do you think Gawp suggests voting Romney just to trigger loonville, because he knows the Republican neocons like the more overt approach. To put it mildly.

    If you want another 9/11 then vote Romney, there are valid arguments for and against that wish. Lol.

  13. Silver Phoenix

    The 9/11 false flag would have happened with Gore, both parties are captured, they tried to get it started with their attack on the twin towers in 93′ with Clinton and Gore in office. Gore had uber israeli firster Joe Lieberman as his vice, half of Obama’s cabinet are the same, particularly key positions. The PNAC plan aka the clean break: a new strategy for securing the realm plan for Israel was going forward and is ongoing as they push for Iran.

  14. Yawp

    What would we need another false flag for? Americans gave up all their freedom after 9/11. We’ve gone to wars all over the place legally and illegally since then. An Obama/Romney war with Iran may be protested by Americans at first but I’m pretty sure the protests would be of no consequence as they were for Iraq and the Wall Street coup. Americans (the people) are also much weaker now than they were a decade ago. Yes they are pissed, but unified they are not. The media has done a masterful job of keeping the people shooting at ghosts in random acts of violence which the police state welcomes as it validates their existence. A brutal global empire will not be stopped at the ballot box. I would look towards the global British empire and the influences that caused their demise, or at least down to a handful of islands.

  15. Flopot

    I thought the PNAC plan was dominated by Republican neocons and twas Cheney himself who oversaw the stand down of the fighter jets and the numerous phoney drills to gridlock the system?

  16. Silver Phoenix

    @yawp
    Events that have been gone over are past tense. Pretext is still sought, Americans aren’t the sum total of the audience.

    @flopot
    “neocons” are israeli firsters who came over from the democratic party, who came from AIPAC, Cheney a WASP face and lacky, the purpose of “neocons” have always been Israel and “is it good for the jews?,” regardless that they don’t speak for all, though polls say they have majority support. PNAC was clean break reworded, relabeled, written in Israel by Israelis for Israel, specifically for then Israeli prime minister Netanyahu, and Clean Break was just the documenting of an agenda that had long been around and pushed.

  17. Flopot

    @Silver Phoenix

    I honestly thought the PNAC and neocon approach was a Republican-only phenomenon. Cheney seems so central to the 9/11 false flag – the man on the spot as it were. You’ve given me lots to think about – thanks for engaging with me. F**k, it is even worse than I thought, if what you say it correct, i.e. that the 9/11 operation would have carried on regardless under Al Gore.

    Again, I am not so sure. Cheney is infamous for installing neocon minions at every level of government. He ensured the administration was ready for the false flag. Anyway, I will definitely research this stuff.

  18. Flopot

    @Yawp

    Leon Panetta is going around warning about a “new Pearl Harbor” and a “new 9/11″ in the form of a cyber attack. Sounds like another buildup to a huge false flag, this time probably aimed at destroying internet freedom.

    This is what I figured the Democrat corportists were good at – taking away liberties by stealth. In my mind the Republicans were the gung-ho variety, hence their “shock and awe” false flags. But like SP says, maybe even that is a false dichotomy.

Comments are closed.